"Non-famous comedian," Guo Degang has become "very famous." Confirmed that many media, Guo Degang was to "ban" - and Guo's book shelves in bookstores are full, Guo-sponsored program to be fully off the air, Guo closure of many small theater is rectification. Continue for several days of confirmation and tracking, to Guo volume to the center of vortex of public hp pavilion dv9000 battery.
"Ban" about a citizen's freedom of speech, freedom and performance freedom. Expressed in terms of law, which is close to "deprive (part) political rights." However, and most of the "ban" the same incident, and no organizations or individuals to come forward, "claimed responsibility." In this "ban" the operation, we do not see the law, can not see the moral. Dare not when, even more than hooliganism hooligans. This is reminiscent of the long circulated on the Internet that vulgar scripts:
You and his bullying, he tell you the law. And you spoke to the law, he and your bullying.
A week ago, "Guo Degang event" only "Li Hebiao intentional wounding." Beat did not put 30 years of penal law, may also constitute "hooliganism." Playing a "rogue" of Li Hebiao blame the media and the Voice, the local police was sentenced to administrative detention for seven days and a fine of 200 yuan. Aside whether reporters Sichuangminzhai and photographed when and inappropriate regardless of "Li Hebiao intentional wounding," the police really talking about "legal." The appropriateness of punishment can be discussed, but the punishment, after all, did not go beyond existing law.
Guo even behind a lot of media allegations of improprieties in its apprentice beat. While some truth to these criticisms, but does not constitute Kuo was "anti-three conventional" cause. Guo of the apprentice's "champions" of speech, there is banter, there is banter, offensive, there are vulgar, but the main purpose of the "excuse." Excuse, even if it is sophistry is permitted by law. Excuse not concluded, but for the judge to provide an observation angle of the incident. If Kuo's defense speech of a particular individual suspected of insult or defamation, the victim could be Guo Degang to court to seek a hp pavilion dv9100 battery.
Sophistry itself does not constitute a reason for being blocked. If so, the critics are active now, I am afraid the majority have to suffer this misfortune. For those who quibble as the industry's lawyers may already be to "ban" a clean.
Legal punishment has been out, "Li Hebiao intentionally wounding" as to the curtain call. Surprisingly, an already closed the "deliberate assault" incident, but involved an outsider raises a result of "anti-3 Custom" and be "blocked." Although Lee Kuo apprentice, but beating is not acceptable Guo Degang Li Hebiao commissioned by the more difficult that job is the social behavior of Devon. Li Hebiao is the responsibility of an independent subject, and he alone punished by law. If the police think that Guo Degang should "Li Hebiao intentionally wounding" responsible, self can be prosecuted according to law; if the batter that Guo Degang should "Li Hebiao intentional assault," civil liability, but also according to the law suit. Law perspective, Guo Degang incident resolved, probably so.
Relevant line "ban" things, because responsibility for these laws, the natural see no light. This sudden move in the dark without leaving Buddha's Palm, powerful, caused serious damage. So it's "Guo door fire, adverse impacts." Kuo book shelves, publishers, operators, vendors and a public audience, became part of "anti-vulgar" and "victims." Governance in accordance with current rule, the media naturally think, is that the famous "relevant" to make a "ban" of the decision. The "relevant" is so hard to find, so that ate a thousand legs Guo Degang and people are unable to seek judicial relief - with the accused being found, but also told who to?
An injury involving only a "security case" to upgrade to deprive others of publication, freedom of speech and political rights to the "political cases", as much as on the private rights of public power in a terrorist attack. Was knocked down, not just Guo Degang and Devon Society "low", since there are citizens willing to "low" hp pavilion dv9200 battery. This is the "Guo Degang incident" in the core, and most worrying place.
Originally, you have your elegant taste, I have my right vulgar. A secular society, "popular" is an unavoidable presence. "Popular" to what extent is "low", no criteria to guide. Secondary, the relevant departments naturally understand. The reason, by "anti-low" step by step, my observation, essentially, through the elegant and the vulgar self-granted power of final interpretation, as against arbitrary power to provide room for maneuver. The "interpretation" in hand, you say you folk customs, not bad too vulgar; that impressive on the decent, popular to be substantial. Guo Degang is because to be "blocked", so Caibei categorized into "Three vulgar." Not because Guo Degang first "three popular", so it must be Guo "ban." Better understand, the same can not explain the "three popular" suspected small Shenyang, Aoi, etc., all in the "Popular anti-3" in the successful escape, and to continue in China for its "vulgar" grab gold and silver medals.
Of course, I have the right to think that small Shenyang, Guo Degang really are "popular", you have the right to think they are very elegant and small Shenyang Guo Degang is really "vulgar." The so-called elegant, vulgar, individuals have the right likes and dislikes, but no right of public power characterization. Even if the majority of the community accepted "conventional", but also by the society and the market to determine the "low" the fate. As long as the public authority does not insult the intelligence of the hp pavilion dv9500 battery, it should be recognized that the public's freedom to choose elegant and vulgar, can rationally while avoiding disadvantages. The selection of vulgar entertainment, may be just too elegant to make up for the boring work, entertainment, the selection of elegant, it may be just around the people in order to show off their tastes. However, the reasons for these choices are What did it matter? The key is, as long as those choices do not violate the law prohibitions, public authority should respect the citizens freedom of choice.
Contemporary China, is a pluralistic society, "Popular anti-3" is also not a pure elegant anti-social. Relative to the elegant or vulgar taste choice, the freedom of choice is always important than quality. Support the healthy development of society is not the result of choice (grade how), but the right to choose. If people are "low", you block a Guo Degang, vulgar people in general will be made a star next "Guo Degang" or "in the German program," carried out in the end to be vulgar. To violent "ban" be forced to accept certain categories of citizens from certain types of elegant or vulgar, is tantamount to asking for the impossible.
On the public authority, it should be a priority, but rather groups of their own hp pavilion dv9700 battery to "anti-3 Vulgarity": Officials fight sugar daddy is a "low", officials dispute mistresses is "low", official cliques is " low ", the officials under the pro-bullying is" low ", officials pray that the" vulgar "and to train urban management to" beat not see blood, "so that the traffic police, political commissar in the hot sun waiting in line to come to wipe, are vulgar, and also shameless. When the sea of arbitrary power, no way restricted, inexorably toward the "low", the rights at stake.
A rule of law, no law should be allowed outside the "ban" a public authority without leaving Buddha's Palm. If a citizen's work or performance contrary to the law, please Zhifa strictly according to law. The territory of the rule of law, the parties argued the right to appeal rights, the right to judicial remedy, the right to request counsel, etc., should be protected. All rights, including the selection of "low" right not vulgar. Rights are respected, as long as the law does not expressly prohibited, the public authority should be respected and maintained the normal exercise of the rights.
The "Li Hebiao intentional wounding," the police "about the law," which deserves recognition. On "Guo Degang deprived of the rights, freedom of speech rights, performance rights incident", Yuji do not speak the law "bullying", which deviated from the orbit of the rule of law. In the media set off for a while, "Guo approved" after orgasm, public opinion is turning to defend the "low" rights. Recognizing the right to defend from the right by law, the civic action and public opinion feedback, the alarm is Yuji, but it is a blessing to the rule of hp pavilion dv1000 battery.
没有评论:
发表评论