How to treat the "petition a judge to wear robes"

Recently, Xiaogan City Intermediate People's Court issued a document, eliminating the von Multimedia Assistant Judge. His wife for 10 years been dismissed, as Mr Justice Bean to help his wife, activist, wearing a robe several petitions attracted wide attention. Some people will suffer as the law of its sorrow, it was suggested that Mr Bean's "obstinacy" demonstrated his faith in law, should be affirmed.



If a few days ago, "Mrs. Hall officials were playing" as a public event together, are considered "ordinary petitioners to restore the pathetic", then now "petition judges to wear robes" were removed from the event, then let us see an "atypical petitioners" and the difficulty of Rights.



Mr Bean said, is "atypical petitioners," nothing but from his special status - a judge. This is what the public events with the "Aspect" and the value. By conventional terms, the right to relief in a situation of widespread poverty, under the objective, is against the interests of ordinary citizens, can not be the normal legal channels of relief, is very normal, very common. "Wrong door" is a good example. Most of the petitioners, all belong to this "typical" of.



However, we know that social justice, the court considered the last line of defense, the judge is the gatekeeper that this line of defense is the patron saint of social justice, the highest. Mr Bean and his wife, the Court set aside on the labor rights disputes, in the end Putting aside the right and wrong. Because the petition, because their own interests, both husband and wife, both on the unit were "removed", which is in any case can not be justified. Note in this regard, "the patron saint of" human rights activists costs, is quite the high. "Patron saint" of the Rights of way and rights are so difficult to remedy when the ordinary citizen's rights protection costs, the difficulty of the right to relief, they can imagine. On the other hand, social justice, the "patron saint" is not just the last line of defense in the fall, people feel a kind of means and no loss and despair.



Petition the judge in uniform wearing the national emblem. You have to admit, at this time, robes, and the national emblem, in fact, civil rights protection has become a bargaining chip and props. Because the ordinary, unremarkable petitioners were unable to draw "a sensation", it is difficult cause seriously, and will not be right and judicial relief. "Do not take extraordinary way" has become a citizen to protect their rights in the "fast track", such as jumping, suicide, and now petition the judge in uniform wearing the national emblem.



Robes of the judges should be a symbol of authority, is a respected source of the judges, is to show fairness and justice of the costume. But now, the chips have become activist citizens and props, this performance art has become a metaphor for citizens to defend their acer aspire 3000 battery, and civil rights protection and the difficulty of empathy generated a lot of resonance and emotional resonance, and people feel a despair: "patron saint" of the Rights of Way and Rights of relief is still so difficult, ordinary people they feel then?



If people would say, not fair is a social norm. But for the people in the face of injustice after society also hope, it must allow the weak to costs less to maintain their rights, this is a necessary condition for establishing social justice. Citizens, especially those "little people" of the Rights lower cost, more contribute to the growth and flourishing of civil society. Be restored from the "ordinary petitioners of tragedy," images, to the present, "atypical petitioners," the defenders of hard, let's see, it is extremely heavy.



Mr Bean said that this is for their own families, but also to their own faith has been the law. "I just use my experience to tell the whole society, not all petitioners who have mental illness, not all petitioners have no grievances and vexatious, not all petitioners who could not understand the law." As the U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William - Rehnquist said: wall of the court "outside" somewhere, circulating currents and trends of public opinion, they tap the door of the court. In any case, "atypical petitioners" performance art protect their rights, certainly should cause us to reflect on. Because it hurt, not only the rights of citizens, as well as citizens of faith in law.